Mosque of Sidi Ghanem in Mila which is not a mosque

A few days ago I had a discussion with Muslims who claimed that the Arabs (Bedouins) in the 6th century had brought civilization to the Berbers. I asked as always if they know where they got this story from and I was skeptical that tent dwellers could have a civilization or have an idea. I explain that the Hijaz (Mecca and Medina), supposedly the birthplace of Islam, contains no archeology attesting to life in the 6th century.
Instead of disproving my statement by showing me that 6th century buildings actually existed in the Hijaz, the holiest region in Islam, in the absence of having anything from this place, the Muslims direct me to a “mosque” built in Algeria of the first Arab-Muslim “conquerors”, the “mosque” of Mila. This building is said to be the work of the conqueror Abou al-Mouhajir Dinar al-Ansari, supposedly the first Muslim governor of this region.



The story of this Abu Dinar is a lie which has no historical basis, like all the history of Islam, which is nothing but bad literature.
It is said in his biography that it is uncertain whether his identity is Arab, Byzantine, Berber or Coptic, since the sources describing him are different and distant in time. One source, the oldest, dating from the 12th century and another much later.
No contemporary sources mention this character. If we have to wait 600 years for someone to write his name, it is clear that we are dealing with lying historians.

The fable about this guy tells us that he even built a mosque that doesn’t look like a Muslim place of worship.



He built a mosque in the 7th century, but could not write his name on a document…..
When we look at the architecture of this place of worship, or maybe not worship, we clearly see that there is nothing Muslim about it. Believers would have prayed, not towards Mecca, but towards Cape Town.
In fact, the entire history of Islam is constructed in this way. Whether it is its birthplace and its pseudo-conquests, it is always without witnesses and after several centuries. This means that the history of the religion that has the most followers in the world is based only on literature which is often very mediocre. A bunch of lies with very serious consequences, but legitimized by both its victims and foreigners who have taken advantage of these lies that have kept a good part of the world’s population out of the race for development.