The Origin of the “Arabian People” in Islamic History

The history of Islam is one of the greatest deceptions of all time, if not the very greatest. Never has a history been so grossly falsified as that of Islam. And, as we all know; the bigger a lie, the more humans like to believe it. From a single lie, which the author could hardly imagine would have such far-reaching consequences, an Arab people was created centuries later. A religion changed its aspect from unitary Christianity born from the minds of genius North African theologians to a sloppy, hurried religion – the world was trapped by this little lie, the lie of one superstitious 9th-century Iberian intellectual named Alvaro of Cordoba. All the misfortune that has struck and still strikes hundreds of millions of naive originates from a word, from just one word, which Alvaro of Cordoba substituted for another in the apocalyptic prophecy of Daniel. He believes he’s found an explanation for the phenomenon which he saw occurring in his city: The total seizure of power by the unitary Christians of a region which was until then pagan, Jewish, unitary and trinitarian Christian, in Spain.

Here is the prophecy of the prophet Daniel:

1The prophecy that Habakkuk the Prophet received.
Habakkuk’s Complaint
2How long, Lord, must I call for help,
but you do not listen?
Or cry out to you, “Violence!”
but you do not save?
3Why do you make me look at injustice?
Why do you tolerate wrongdoing?
Destruction and violence are before me;
there is strife, and conflict abounds.
4Therefore the law is paralyzed,
and justice never prevails.
The wicked hem in the righteous,
so that justice is perverted.

The Lord’s Answer
5“Look at the nations and watch—
and be utterly amazed.
For I am going to do something in your days
that you would not believe,
even if you were told.
6I am raising up the Chaldeans (Babylonians), a
that ruthless and impetuous people,
who sweep across the whole earth
to seize dwellings not their own.
7They are a feared and dreaded people;
they are a law to themselves
and promote their own honor.
8Their horses are swifter than leopards,
fiercer than wolves at dusk.
Their cavalry gallops headlong;
their horsemen come from afar.
They fly like an eagle swooping to devour;
9they all come intent on violence.
Their hordes b advance like a desert wind
and gather prisoners like sand.
10They mock kings
and scoff at rulers.
They laugh at all fortified cities;
by building earthen ramps they capture them.
11Then they sweep past like the wind and go on—
guilty people, whose own strength is their god.”

Alvaro’s modification was so small, almost nothing. He replaced the word “Chaldeans” with “Arabians.” 

At that time everything indicates that the term “Arab” did not designate a people, but rather it was a pejorative expression made for nomads without faith or law. It was an insult! The term ‘Arab’ did not refer to a specific people but rather to a nomadic lifestyle. It was an expression of the contempt Alvaro had for the unitary Christians, the competitors of trinitarian Christianity. This is how we must understand what Ibn Khaldun (historian of the 14th century) meant when he called the Arabs locusts, and the words of Allah who said that they are lazy and devoid of morality. Never before had history associated the name of an Arab people with rulers, artists, or thinkers. This lie gave rise to an Arab people and eventually led to the emergence of the religion of Islam centuries later.

Similarly, it was through a similar substitution that corrupt historians, in their commentary, translation, or interpretation of his work ‘Indiculus luminosus’, applied it to Mohammed and Islam. They seized the possibility of deceiving the world. Alvaro did not know Allah or Mohammed! He had never heard of them before the year 850, through his friend Eulogius of Córdoba who was returning from France with news of a budding religion in their city of Córdoba – a discovery he made by chance while reading documents in a library at the house of his host.

From the seventh and eighth centuries, the period of the so-called Arab conquests, we have no substantial historical records remaining from the seventh and eighth centuries, the period commonly referred to as the Arab conquests, as everything has been systematically destroyed. Only in the ninth century do historical accounts begin to provide us with narratives. From the ninth century, we have two Spanish testimonies. One is the “Indiculus de adventu Enoch et Eliae”, an anonymous testimony from the end of the ninth and beginning of the tenth century. The other is the “Indiculus Luminosus” by Alvare of Cordoba. Here is an excerpt from what the commentators say about these two works. The first is my own translation of the original French text. The second is in English. Screenshots are provided, as proof of what I’m saying.

A century before Adson, the author of Indiculus therefore absorbed the different elements of the tradition established since Irenaeus of Lyon and accumulated by exegetes. His Antichrist will be a real man possessed by Satan, not a demon; come from the Jewish people, he will be born from the tribe of Dan. Tyrant and simulator of holiness in one, he will use force and persuasion to dominate populations. The anti-Judaic tone of the treaty, which we thought best to include in the name of authenticity, is inherited from Victorin, Isidore and Beatus. The interpretation is in keeping with tradition, and makes no allusion at all to Islam or a Muslim rule of the Peninsula (Spain) in the contemporary context of writing. In this, the treatise clearly differs from a contemporary work also utilizing exegesis, the Indiculus Luminosus by Alvare of Cordoba. In this controversial and apologetic work, Alvare refers to Muhammad and the Antichrist as one and the same, and also refers to Islam.

Through this excerpt we can confirm that Alvare never mentioned Muhammad by name. He does not mention it for the sole reason that Mohammad’s name was irrelevant in his day.

Christianity and Islam were originally the same religion. In fact, historians are the origin of Islam. Before being dressed up as a religion of the people of the desert by their falsification, Islam was unitary Arian Christianity (named after Arius, a Christian Lybian bishop). Then, it was carried forth by the Gothic barbarians who were converted to Arian Christianity long before Mohamed’s pseudo-existence was swathed in theology. The feasts in Valhalla found in Northern Mythology are the origin of the jihad and holy wars that have degenerated this religion to become Islam. Thus, the Goths could absolve themselves of the blame. They had the brilliant idea of changing words here and names there. When the word heresy appeared in ancient writing they changed it to Islam, the word heretic became Arabic, Moorish, Saracen. An allusion to an antichrist becomes Mohammed in the footnotes of the forgers. Through this subterfuge they forged this religion with the people which they had defeated during the raids on the rich countries of the South. This is, roughly, what Muslims are subjected to.

My next article will concern itself with the holy mosque in Mecca, Masjid Al Haram. The translation of that name reads, in truth, “The Forbidden Temple”. But it is always referred to as “The Holy Mosque”. This tricks believers and everyone else also – none are aware of the truth hidden in this discrepancy… 
Read also: Blonde blue-eyed from Hedjaz desert ,Arabia ?