Arabape eller Berberape?

Khadafi,  araberne og venstresidens helt, har igjen benektet eksistensen av berber folket.

De “demokratiske” landene, de “moderne” statene, de “utviklete” samfunnene, Vesten, de “siviliserte” og Jonas Gahr Støre har ikke funnet noe å si til dette.

Kanskje vi må bare akseptere det, ifølge Khadafis mange venner er det 50 million mennesker som ikke finnes .

Siste nytt!!

…  Khadafi benekter også Berberapens eksistens.  Ifølge han er Berberapen egentlig en Arabape. I FN menneskerettighetrådet krever Khadafi at verdens samfunnet skal slutte å kalle den for Berberape. Nå er vi spent.. hvordan skal de “siviliserte” reagere!!!

4 Replies to “Arabape eller Berberape?”

  1. Kall gjerne alle araberne aper for min del.
    De opptrer jo også meget ofte i flokker, bråker, truer andre og ødelegger livsverk møysommelig bygd opp i generasjoner.
    Hva er Gadaffi selv egentlig?
    Berber, araber eller ape?
    Han har jo forøvrig en sønn som heter Hannibal, etter sigende et typisk arabisk navn.

  2. Hei Ugle Sett
    Først må jeg komme med en liten rettelse av din siste kommentar; Hannibal er ikke et arabisk navn. Navnet er Fønisk. Hannibal var såkalt generalen som slåss mot Roma.

    Du sier: “De opptrer jo også meget ofte i flokker, bråker, truer andre og ødelegger livsverk….”
    Man skulle tro at du har bodd i et muslimsk land. Men du har glemt noe vesentlig: Muslimer har ingen problemer med å kutte strupen til de vantro. Slik skjedde med Pavens representant i Tyrkia sist uke. Han var Pavens representant for dialog mellom religioner…….

    1. Det med Hannibal var ironisk ment.
      Cæsars erobring av Kartago et av historiens verste blodbad etter det jeg har lest.

  3. In the third century BC Massinissa was king of the Numidians. His Father, Gaia, was king of the Massylies.

    On the death of the father, the inheritance received allowed the son to achieve unity of the 2 tribes, the Masaesyles and the Massyles into a single people. Thus began the building of the western history of North Africa. In this northern region of the African continent, if the distant past of Egypt and Libya has been clearly established, the countries located to the west of Tripolitania is only known in a hypothetical manner before the advent of Carthage.

    But then came Massinissa and North Africa enter the history of the world. And it may be because of this exceptional reputation that European and Arab writers, perhaps anxious to shine chapters relating to their own countries, have dodged the person and work of this prestigious character: the King of Numidia.

    It seems that the name of Massinissa is a nickname rather ripe for a nickname. First, we must decompose the name in “Mass”, and “Inissa”. “Mass” means “Sir”, as “Massa” means “Lady”. Then it is likely that this king has been nicknamed “Inissi” word meaning Hedgehog, which has become “Inissa” by use or by distortion. Indeed this chief had a reputation for being picky and uncompromising, or “prickly” in its relations, just as he should have a tendency to withdraw into himself to literally become an impregnable ball when under adversity. That did not prevent him from being recognized of high value.

    Upon his accession to the throne, now unified under his leadership, Massinissa began to realize a vast empire across this vast west Mediterranean area. That dream immediately bumped into a double hostility:

    * that of Carthage, who did not want to see its prestige eclipsed on the extent of the land of Africa and,

    * that of Rome, which opposed any competition of its force in the Mediterranean.

    He should therefore strengthen itself to impose his mark on those two powerful neighbors, dominant to Africa and rival between them. The measures taken at the domestic level were:

    1. settle mainly nomadic population to cultivate and develop the country’s wealth;
    2. establish fixed markets fueled by economic circuits;
    3. create and lead an army commander composed of infantry and cavalry used separate or combined;
    4. innovate militarily using elephants as part of heavy fighting.

    As expected from the outside, the rivalry between Rome and Carthage has degenerated into what was called the Punic wars. In this case, Carthage, mistress of Africa, had money but lacked experienced troops to support combat. It was therefore natural that Massinissa was asked to help Phoenicians washing the affront received at their defeat against the Roman army. The bargaining were accompanied by numerous offers from Carthage, in case of common victory, involving Moors and Numidians in the conduct of war operation. To various clauses regarding expenditure and rewards, it was included the granting of citizenship of Carthage with the advantages related to the benefit of combatants and their relatives.

    The organizational Expeditionary Force reserved the supreme command of the convoy to the Phoenician Hannibal, who joined the convoy in transit and surrounded by a consequent commandment. The operational management of troops remain to the Numidian Massinissa, especially because of the African languages spoken by the fighters of the Expeditionary Force in Africa. The war was won. But the Carthaginian Senate disowned its commitments regarding the promised granting of citizenship. This alliance thus betrayed was therefore forced to break. Therefore, Carthage, reduced again to its own elements, was again defeated by the Romans, and this time destroyed.

    The lessons learned from this adventure are fabulous:

    1. prodigious entry of the battles Berber forces in the history of the universe;
    2. revelation of a major Numidian warlord ;
    3. creating of a great tool of war with:

    * organization and training of combat units on foot, and / or horseback;
    * introduction of elephants in the battle-group;
    * organizing and training of transportation’s units : on land, and sea;
    * organization and training of command levels ;
    * organization and training of media;
    * organization and training of stewards to man and animals;
    * coordination of food supply and resources of combat;
    * coordination of all elements in static position and / or movement;
    * coordination of combatants during the rough-and-tumble;
    * organization of groups, en route stops, or forehead;

    * separation of powers and areas in: tactics, strategy, logistics, command execution, and replacement, etc..

    That is what the Carthaginians were wasted by losing their alliance with the Africans. That is also what the Romans discovered at Massinissa and they seek to recover for their armies.

    Another famous Berber will reuse these values to his ascension, since he will provide the leadership of Rome: Septimius Severus.

    In addition to the worth of this illustrious ancestor, worth being included in the gallery of heroes models of all time, it should be noted:

    * the rule of multi weapon command, multi army and intercontinental command, imposed by the technician es-profession of arms;
    * the now accepted dominant role of Africa in the western Mediterranean;
    * the invention of an emblem that would be perpetuated through space and time as the flag.

Leave a Reply